<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/13950213?origin\x3dhttp://nippity.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
It's ANOTHER weird universe!!!!
 

Baby buffalo is a metaphor for?

Lee is a realist. He can't seem to wrap his mind around metaphors. Well, maybe it's not a thing about him not understanding, maybe he just doesn't like them. We were talking about Tim O'Brien's book--the part about the baby buffalo that we both read in class, and he made fun of it so badly, that I don't think I can read the passage in the future without thinking of "aliens zapping people's skin off".

I guess what i wanted to say is that there are different kinds of readers out there. And, I'm still mad that Lee ruined Tim O'Brien for me--hopefully not permanently. I still think that Tim O'Brien is a fantastic writer and I believe I will still be moved by his writing. But what I found out is that metaphors can be silly if a reader misses the point. They are literary tools, but I guess everything that asks a reader to make connection for themslves always poses a risk. And that there is nothing as devastating as when someone makes fun of that loose connection. Because, then everything just becomes quite silly.

I have to read the passage again, because I found that when Lee challenged me to tell him what the baby buffalo is a metaphor for, I couldn't answer. Damn!

There